Peer Reviewing
- gdp175
- Apr 3, 2018
- 1 min read
Our group began with Grant's paper about Doak.
Grant's style of writing is still unclear. We went between a couple different types. As a group, we reccomended he determined a specific form and to stick with it.
Grant is very specific with his descriptions. He has a lot of good material, but lacks fluidity and a clear structre. With a little work and added dialouge, the paper could improve immensly.
The choice and perspective of the paper are very interesting and I look forward to reading the final draft.
Next, I worked on Lauren's paper. Vignette style was Laurens choice of writing for her paper.
Her voice is clear from the beginning of the paper, and this unique tone draws you in as a reader.
Lauren is working on incorporating time differences into her paper. Right now it feels a little jumpy, which could work, especially in the beginning. But, I would apprecite if the time was subtley brought into the paper a little more.
Comments